Refrigerator Magnet Suggestions

A Quantative and Qualitative Analysis of Certain Refrigerator Magnets

 

“Life sucks and then you die”

“Suck” is factually relative as to both its nature and quantity.  What is the base-line against which to measure the life in question?  For example, are we lining up that life against Nat Turner, Marilyn Monroe or Mick Jagger?

“Death,” on the other hand, might seem more finite in each regard.  However, if you contemplate an afterlife or resurrection then once again you are in search of metrics.

It does not seem that statistical analysis will help us much here.  Suggestions for standards of measurement are solicited.

 

“No good deed goes unpunished”

“Good deed” seems to not involve issues of quantification as any deed, no matter how small, may prove valuable.  The definition of ‘good” is, however, deep in the value system of the observer.

“Punishment” is more complex.  First, it is undefined against an almost infinite range of possibilities.  Second, the entire concept is qualitatively anomalous; if the deed is good, why is the result bad?

My observation of life informs me that no analysis can occur here; do not affix this thought to your refrigerator.

 

“Even a stopped clock is correct twice a day”

Qualitatively, the elements (“clock” and “day”) are reasonably  clear and categorical.

Quantitively, we seem also on similarly sound ground.  “Twice” is precise.  “Day”  is generic but then again they are all the same number of hours, world over, so there is no uncertainty.

This expression consequently is unambiguous and worthy of repetition.  Its use is highly situational but, alas, we are not here called upon to deal with frequency of applicability.  Go ahead and use it.

 

Conclusion

By now, I trust you have gotten the hang of it.  Please submit similar analyses to [email protected]; worthy submissions will be posted with credit to the person submitting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com